<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>netmf4stm32 Issue Tracker Rss Feed</title><link>https://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/list/basic</link><description>netmf4stm32 Issue Tracker Rss Description</description><item><title>Edited Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/12</link><description>It would be great if you could add support for the native IFU &amp;#40;In-Field Update&amp;#41; of the STM32 F4 like GHI Electronics did this in premium boards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS&lt;br /&gt;IFU makes this mcu serious usable for production with .net micro framework.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;Darek&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>dariog</author><pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:39:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Edited Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12] 20130524123944P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/12</link><description>It would be great if you could add support for the native IFU &amp;#40;In-Field Update&amp;#41; of the STM32 F4 like GHI Electronics did this in premium boards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS&lt;br /&gt;IFU makes this mcu serious usable for production with .net micro framework.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;Darek&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Any ideas&amp;#63;</description><author>dariog</author><pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:39:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12] 20130524123924P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/12</link><description>It would be great if you could add support for the native IFU &amp;#40;In-Field Update&amp;#41; of the STM32 F4 like GHI Electronics did this in premium boards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS&lt;br /&gt;IFU makes this mcu serious usable for production with .net micro framework.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;Darek&lt;br /&gt;Comments: OK. I should use MicroBooter &amp;#40;MFUpdate works only with this booter&amp;#41; instead of TinyBooter but how&amp;#63; &amp;#58;&amp;#41;&amp;#10;&amp;#10;Regards&amp;#10;Darek</description><author>dariog</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 21:26:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12] 20130509092632P</guid></item><item><title>Edited Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/12</link><description>It would be great if you could add support for the native IFU &amp;#40;In-Field Update&amp;#41; of the STM32 F4 like GHI Electronics did this in premium boards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS&lt;br /&gt;IFU makes this mcu serious usable for production with .net micro framework.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;Darek&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>dariog</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 21:06:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Edited Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12] 20130509090656P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/12</link><description>It would be great if you could add support for the native IFU &amp;#40;In-Field Update&amp;#41; of the STM32 F4 like GHI Electronics did this in premium boards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS&lt;br /&gt;IFU makes this mcu serious usable for production with .net micro framework.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;Darek&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Ok. I try to use this method but I see one major problem. This not work. &amp;#58;&amp;#40;&amp;#10;&amp;#10;I add reference to MFUpdate.DLL and Microsoft.SPOT.Update to solution and run application in debug.&amp;#10;App do nothing&amp;#58;&amp;#10;&amp;#10;&amp;#96;&amp;#96;&amp;#96;&amp;#10;    public class Program&amp;#10;    &amp;#123;&amp;#10;        public static void Main&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#10;        &amp;#123;&amp;#10;            Debug.Print&amp;#40;&amp;#34;Hi&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&amp;#10;        &amp;#125;&amp;#10;    &amp;#125;&amp;#10;&amp;#96;&amp;#96;&amp;#96;&amp;#10;When I run then I&amp;#39;ve got&amp;#58;&amp;#10;&amp;#34;Found debugger&amp;#33;&amp;#34;&amp;#10;...&amp;#10;Loading assemblies and... freeze. Nothing helps. To bring device back I must run MFDeploy and erase Deployment. Without debugger application do not start either.&amp;#10;&amp;#10;Is it porting kit issue&amp;#63;&amp;#10;&amp;#10;Regards</description><author>dariog</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:22:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12] 20130509122226P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/12</link><description>It would be great if you could add support for the native IFU &amp;#40;In-Field Update&amp;#41; of the STM32 F4 like GHI Electronics did this in premium boards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS&lt;br /&gt;IFU makes this mcu serious usable for production with .net micro framework.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;Darek&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Looks very promising. Thanks. &amp;#58;&amp;#41;</description><author>dariog</author><pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 21:20:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12] 20130508092037P</guid></item><item><title>Edited Issue: Support .NET MF 4.3 [8]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/8</link><description>MicroFramework 4.3 RTM is out now and does not contain your STM32 changes.&lt;br /&gt;Would be great if you could support the new framework version too.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>Cuno</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:04:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Edited Issue: Support .NET MF 4.3 [8] 20130507020431P</guid></item><item><title>Closed Issue: Support .NET MF 4.3 [8]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/8</link><description>MicroFramework 4.3 RTM is out now and does not contain your STM32 changes.&lt;br /&gt;Would be great if you could support the new framework version too.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>Cuno</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:04:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Closed Issue: Support .NET MF 4.3 [8] 20130507020431P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Support .NET MF 4.3 [8]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/8</link><description>MicroFramework 4.3 RTM is out now and does not contain your STM32 changes.&lt;br /&gt;Would be great if you could support the new framework version too.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: A NETMF 4.3 release is tentatively planned for the end of June.</description><author>Cuno</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:04:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Support .NET MF 4.3 [8] 20130507020406P</guid></item><item><title>Edited Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/12</link><description>It would be great if you could add support for the native IFU &amp;#40;In-Field Update&amp;#41; of the STM32 F4 like GHI Electronics did this in premium boards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS&lt;br /&gt;IFU makes this mcu serious usable for production with .net micro framework.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;Darek&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>Cuno</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:02:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Edited Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12] 20130507020249P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/12</link><description>It would be great if you could add support for the native IFU &amp;#40;In-Field Update&amp;#41; of the STM32 F4 like GHI Electronics did this in premium boards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS&lt;br /&gt;IFU makes this mcu serious usable for production with .net micro framework.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;Darek&lt;br /&gt;Comments: There is a prototype implementation of Microsoft&amp;#39;s standard MFUpdate &amp;#47; Microbooter mechanism available here https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;netmf4stm32.codeplex.com&amp;#47;SourceControl&amp;#47;changeset&amp;#47;view&amp;#47;3777efa40cf1 as a community contribution.&amp;#10;&amp;#10;See here http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;download.codeplex.com&amp;#47;download&amp;#63;ProjectName&amp;#61;netmf&amp;#38;DownloadId&amp;#61;257831 for more information on MFUpdate.&amp;#10;&amp;#10;The author of this contribution would certainly welcome in-depth feedback and testing of the code&amp;#33;</description><author>Cuno</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:01:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12] 20130507020152P</guid></item><item><title>Created Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/12</link><description>It would be great if you could add support for the native IFU &amp;#40;In-Field Update&amp;#41; of the STM32 F4 like GHI Electronics did this in premium boards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS&lt;br /&gt;IFU makes this mcu serious usable for production with .net micro framework.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;Darek&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>dariog</author><pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 21:38:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Unassigned: IFU (In-Field Udpate) [12] 20130414093835P</guid></item><item><title>Created Unassigned: Support for hardware Watchdog [11]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/11</link><description>It would be great if you could add support for the hardware watchdog of the STM32 F4. Hardware watchdog makes this mcu serious usable for production with .net micro framework.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;m planning use stm32f4 with .net micro framework in production for my clients but without this function I must use some external. &amp;#58;&amp;#40;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;Darek&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>dariog</author><pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 21:34:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Unassigned: Support for hardware Watchdog [11] 20130414093451P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Support .NET MF 4.3 [8]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/8</link><description>MicroFramework 4.3 RTM is out now and does not contain your STM32 changes.&lt;br /&gt;Would be great if you could support the new framework version too.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Hi,&amp;#10;any news available about STM32F4 support for 4.3 &amp;#63;</description><author>MCProfiler</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:45:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Support .NET MF 4.3 [8] 20130410094509A</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Win8 STM32_WinUSB_drivers_(for_evaluation_purposes_only) not working? [10]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/10</link><description>The USB driver seems not to work for Win8. Is there a workaround to get it running&amp;#63; The driver is not signed, so I installed it in extended boot mechanism. It was installed well. Plugging in the Discovery board I can see in MFDeploy very shortly - but then the driver is not present anymore. If I type the driver name in manually MFDeploy is telling me that the device is unkown. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is there a workaround to get the driver running with WIN8 or is a driver available&amp;#63;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks a lot for your help, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheers&amp;#33;&lt;br /&gt;StanDeMan&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>StanDeMan</author><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:32:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Win8 STM32_WinUSB_drivers_(for_evaluation_purposes_only) not working? [10] 20130216103233P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: SPI Clock Edges [5]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/5</link><description>are messed up. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;as mentioned in the discussion&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;it looks like the spi clock edge is messed up.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;on spi1 it just works if its false &amp;#40;wich my chip dont likes&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;on spi3 its looks like its inverse &amp;#40;my chips workes when in software its set to false, he shouldnt work this way&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: i found out these bug only happens when the spi frequenzy is at around 1mhz - at 2mhz everything is fine.&amp;#10;sorry, i dont have a logic analizer, so i cant really test, but my devices are working fine with 2mhz frequenzy&amp;#33;&amp;#10;&amp;#10;&amp;#40;on sam7x boards they worked at 1mhz too ..&amp;#41;&amp;#10;&amp;#10;someone meantioned it could be also a frequenzy dividier bug</description><author>MichiM</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:55:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: SPI Clock Edges [5] 20130107095559P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Support .NET MF 4.3 [8]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/8</link><description>MicroFramework 4.3 RTM is out now and does not contain your STM32 changes.&lt;br /&gt;Would be great if you could support the new framework version too.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: Any estimate on when the 4.3 delta for STM32F4 will be available for download</description><author>Zzykonn</author><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:54:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Support .NET MF 4.3 [8] 20121228095434A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: SPI Clock Edges [5]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/5</link><description>are messed up. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;as mentioned in the discussion&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;it looks like the spi clock edge is messed up.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;on spi1 it just works if its false &amp;#40;wich my chip dont likes&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;on spi3 its looks like its inverse &amp;#40;my chips workes when in software its set to false, he shouldnt work this way&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: any news on the spi issue &amp;#63;</description><author>MichiM</author><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:30:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: SPI Clock Edges [5] 20121219113046A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Support CANbus [9]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/9</link><description>It would be great if you could add support for the CAN interfaces of the STM32 F4.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: What do you mean with CANbus stack&amp;#63; Isn&amp;#39;t it enough to wrap the CAN hardware from the STM32 and make it available for use in NETMF.&amp;#10;&amp;#10;Similar to what GHI did&amp;#58;&amp;#10;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;www.ghielectronics.com&amp;#47;downloads&amp;#47;NETMF&amp;#47;Library&amp;#37;20Documentation&amp;#37;20v4.2&amp;#47;Premium&amp;#47;html&amp;#47;960583b9-92b9-54a5-be04-2e306ac031f3.htm&amp;#10;&amp;#10;Or the MCP2515 shield using SPI&amp;#58;&amp;#10;https&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;code.google.com&amp;#47;p&amp;#47;netduino-mcp2515&amp;#47;</description><author>tibel</author><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:11:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Support CANbus [9] 20121219101122A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Support CANbus [9]</title><link>http://netmf4stm32.codeplex.com/workitem/9</link><description>It would be great if you could add support for the CAN interfaces of the STM32 F4.&lt;br /&gt;Comments: I would love to see that as well, but for the foreseeable future we don&amp;#39;t have the resources to do that. If anyone know of a &amp;#40;preferrably Apache 2.0 licensed&amp;#41; high-quality open source CANbus stack, please let me know&amp;#33;&amp;#10;&amp;#10;Cuno</description><author>Cuno</author><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:18:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Support CANbus [9] 20121218081805P</guid></item></channel></rss>